This article is shared with LebTown by content partner Spotlight PA.
By Stephen Caruso of Spotlight PA
HARRISBURG โ With three weeks until the June 30 deadline to pass a new spending plan, Pennsylvania lawmakers appear split over how much of the stateโs multi-billion surplus to invest in public services โ a fundamental divide that must be resolved to move forward on the budget.
The Democratic-controlled state House last week passed an expanded version of Gov. Josh Shapiroโs budget plan that adds hundreds of millions of dollars to the stateโs education system. It faced immediate opposition from Republicans who control the state Senate.
This disconnect over spending isnโt the only potential hurdle looming as budget talks heat up.
Itโs too early to tell if lawmakers will finish a deal by June 30, but some have noted that blowing the statutory deadline isnโt a major issue in the short term.
The state has a legal obligation to pay its workers and continue their benefits during budget impasses, and is broadly able to keep the government running and delay payments if thereโs no deal. Schools and other state-funded social services would likely start to feel a pinch come August or September.
State Senate Majority Leader Joe Pittman (R., Indiana) downplayed the deadline in April, saying his priority was designing โa responsible product.โ
School spending vs. rainy day savings
Earlier this year, Shapiro, a Democrat, proposed a $44.4 billion budget plan thatย includes $1 billion in new education spending. Democrats, newly in control of the state House, advanced legislation last week that adds $900 million to Shapiroโs proposal mostly on education spending โ including $225 million for the stateโs 100 poorest districts.
They have argued such an investment is necessary to respond to a Commonwealth Court ruling that found Pennsylvaniaโs school funding system is unconstitutionally inequitable.
The bill advanced by state House Democrats also transfers $450 million in state tax revenue into two new restricted accounts or so-called โspecial fundsโ: $250 million for school building construction and $200 million for a year-old state program to help fund home repair projects.
Democrats justified the increased spending by pointing to this yearโs slightly higher-than-expected tax revenue as well as the roughly $12 billion the state has stashed in cash reserves and its rainy day fund.
โHouse Democrats show you what we got. We show you what we believe in. We show you what we think is important. We show you what we think we should be investing in,โ state House Appropriations Committee Chair Jordan Harris (D., Philadelphia) said during a debate on the chamberโs floor.
The plan passed the narrowly divided state House in a party-line, 102-101 vote and is now before the Republican-controlled state Senate.
In a statement, state Senate Republican spokesperson Kate Flessner said the Democratsโ proposal โraises substantial concerns.โ
โThe Senate Republican Caucus is committed to working to put in place a responsible spending plan that will help strengthen Pennsylvania now and in future years,โ she added.
Both Shapiroโs and state House Democratsโ plans continue a number of pandemic-era social programs without raising new revenue. Republicans in both chambers have argued that the plans will drain the stateโs cash reserves too quickly while the commonwealth faces an uncertain economic future.
โOn the federal level, they have said for some time that a recession was coming,โ state House Minority Leader Bryan Cutler (R., Lancaster) said during the Houseโs floor debate last week. โAt some point, they will be right. And if youโve spent all the money before the recession gets here, youโre gonna have tough discussions and tough decisions to make.โ
Republicans have also tried to play up a split between state House Democrats and their governor, saying in floor remarks and statements that Democrats had turned their back on Shapiro by passing their own plan.
After the plan passed, Shapiroโs office released a statement saying he โcommends the new House Democratic majority for taking this important step forward and adding to our shared priorities as we work to pass a commonsense budget.โ
The governor also appeared in a closed-door meeting with state House Democrats before the vote, multiple sources told Spotlight PA, giving a โpep talk.โ He congratulated the caucus for advancing its agenda in recent weeks, highlighting bills that would implement LGBTQ non-discrimination protections and strengthen the stateโs gun laws.
A perennial university debate looms
An early potential stumbling block is the fate of $606 million in aid for four state-related universities โ an appropriation that slowed talks last year. This money has historically subsidized tuition for in-state students at Lincoln University, Penn State, Temple University, and the University of Pittsburgh.
In a recent press release, the Pennsylvania Freedom Caucus, a group of conservative state House lawmakers modeled after the Congressional Freedom Caucus, threatened to hold up the slice of money slated for Penn State for political reasons.
Members highlighted a passage on Penn State Healthโs website which notes its childrenโs hospital โprovides puberty-blocking medications, cares for people with differences of sexual development and cares for patients who are younger than 10 years old.โ
Itโs unclear if the Freedom Caucus has enough votes to hold up Penn Stateโs budget allocation.
Under the state constitution, funding for private or state-affiliated institutions, like Penn State, requires a two-thirds vote rather than a simple majority to be approved. That means just 68 nos could block their funding.
This relatively low bar means the so-called โnon-preferredโ appropriations often turn into a political bargaining chip during budget negotiations for dissident rank-and-filers.
The Freedom Caucus has at least 16 members listed on its website, but also asserts that โtotal representation may not be shown as some members are anonymous.โ
A handful of conservative Republicans, many of whom have since joined the Freedom Caucus, threatened to vote against funding for Penn Medicine in 2021, mostly for a veterinary school, because of the medical systemโs COVID-19 vaccine policy.
Republican opposition to vaccine mandates also influenced Penn State Universityโs decision to strongly recommend, rather than require, the vaccine. And last yearโs budget was delayed partially over fetal tissue research at the University of Pittsburgh.
The Freedom Caucus claimed in its statement that Penn State Health prescribes puberty blockers to children under the age of 10 โ something the organization said is misleading.
In an emailed statement, Penn State Health said such medications are only prescribed to treat premature puberty in children under 10, not gender dysphoria.
โPenn State Health adheres to the international guidelines that do not support irreversible changes to children as it relates to gender dysphoria care, and there are no plans to change this position,โ the statement added.
Penn State University and Penn State Health are separate entities; the former is a state-related university system, and the latter is a nonprofit hospital chain associated with Penn Stateโs medical school.
Not every state House Republican agrees with the Freedom Caucusโ effort. State Rep. Tom Mehaffie (R., Dauphin), whose district includes two Penn State Health hospitals, including the childrenโs hospital, said that while he doesnโt agree with all of the systemโs decisions, he thought the connection between the school and hospital was strained.
โPitt, Penn State, whoโs next?โ Mehaffie told Spotlight PA. โItโs a witch hunt.โ
WHILE YOUโRE HERE… If you learned something from this story, pay it forward and become a member of Spotlight PA so someone else can in the future at spotlightpa.org/donate. Spotlight PA is funded by foundations and readers like you who are committed to accountability journalism that gets results.