This article was funded by LebTown donors as part of our Civic Impact Reporting Project.
In a narrow vote, Cornwall Borough Council approved the preliminary plan for a 400,060-square-foot warehouse proposed for Boyd Street at Monday night’s borough council meeting.

Council members Bruce Harris, Bruce Conrad, and Thomas Burton voted to approve, with Julie Bowman and Thomas Lux voting against. Council member Eric Tobias was absent from the meeting and John Karinch abstained.
“First, you gotta follow the law folks,” said Conrad, noting that Cornwall Properties CEO John Byler is still interested in building a lakefront resort on the site and the borough is pursuing a Miners Village bypass. “Facts are stubborn things. Second, [Byler] has stressed over and over he doesn’t want to build this warehouse so this is our opportunity to get another thing built up there.”
“I made my mind up two and a half hours ago,” said Lux after voting no on the plan. “I ran (for Council) on the fact that I didn’t want any more development in Cornwall and I’m sticking to it.”
Bowman said that she would have approved the plan if Byler was willing to accept conditions requiring Cornwall Properties to take into account a borough-conducted traffic study and soil/cave-in zone research once they become available. Council has taken steps toward soliciting an independent traffic study spanning the borough.

Read More: (June 2026) Cornwall council hears concerns over Miners Village development
In case you missed it…
Background on this story
During July 2022, Cornwall Properties came to the borough with two conceptual plans: one, allowed by right, with multiple warehouses totaling around 700,000 square footage in its limited industrial tract, and one, which would have required a zoning amendment, for an 800,000-square-foot warehouse in its general industrial tract. This plan was met with outcry from residents, and the developer ultimately withdrew its zoning amendment request in 2024 citing resident feedback and desire to work with the borough.
Also in July 2022, the borough established an ad hoc committee to work with Cornwall Properties on developing mutually agreeable conditions for development, citing a similar process and agreement made with the site’s previous potential developer Haines and Kibblehouse. However, without submitted plans or a clear direction, the committee soon paused indefinitely.
In 2023, Cornwall Properties submitted a zoning text amendment removing manufacturing as a limited industrial permitted use and adding it to general industrial, approved by council in 2024. This was to allow for the PRL plan (approved July 2024), which used part of Cornwall Properties’ GI tract for submarine part manufacturing, and was expedited due to pressure on the business to ramp up production.
When this text amendment was submitted, Cornwall Properties representatives said the initially-requested amendment to allow an 800,000-square-foot warehouse in GI would be withdrawn if it was approved. The developer then withdrew that amendment, citing community push against the warehouse project.
In 2023, resident group Citizens United 4 Responsible Development submitted a citizens’ amendment which would remove warehousing as a permitted use in limited industrial and add it as a permitted conditional use in general commercial. This amendment was advanced in 2024, but ultimately paused as the borough intended to combine it with the Lakefront Resort Text Amendment, submitted later by Cornwall Properties.
That amendment, first discussed by the P&Z Feb. of 2024, creates a mixed-use overlay in limited industrial lake-adjacent sites allowing for uses including various forms of housing, restaurants and retail businesses, hotels, and potential water recreational uses.

Submitted alongside a conceptual plan for a Cornwall Properties lakefront development, the amendment was discussed by P&Z but ultimately put on pause. Recently, council member Bruce Conrad has said the plan’s pause is due to ongoing discussions with the Elizabethtown Area Water Authority for the borough to obtain land for a Miners Village bypass.
Cornwall Properties president and CEO John Byler has said in recent P&Z meetings that the lakefront resort development continues to be his ideal for the property, but that extended delays have caused the developer to pursue other options. As the lakefront resort is not permitted based on zoning as-is, Cornwall Properties submitted the 400,000-square-foot warehouse plan Jan. 30, 2026, with warehousing remaining an allowed use in limited industrial.
Since then, the plan has been resubmitted three times as the borough engineer and solicitor reviewed each version of the plan and offered feedback based on borough ordinances and the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code. During this time, Cornwall Properties offered three time extensions, which were accepted by the borough.
With a July 14 deadline for approval or rejection of the plan, the P&Z requested another time extension from Cornwall Properties, which was rejected. With the borough engineer and solicitor both recommending approval of the plan subject to addressing remaining items, saying borough requirements have been met to their satisfaction, P&Z unanimously recommended approval of the warehouse plan, though multiple commission members expressed a dislike for the plan and its potential impact on borough roads and traffic.
Meanwhile, the P&Z continues to oversee the review of the Knoll plan, which has similarly raised resident concerns about traffic overflow into Miners Village. Though an earlier version (contingent on the construction of a Miners Village bypass) showed 100 lots to be built out over multiple phases, the most recent version of the plan contains 52 units in one phase, accessed primarily from Boyd Street.
Read More:
- (July 2022) Cornwall Borough Council hears concept plans from Byler Holdings, one including a nearly 800,000-square-foot warehouse
- (March 2024) Cornwall Borough considers combining citizens’ and lakefront amendments
- (Jan. 2024) Cornwall council unanimously adopts adopts Byler manufacturing amendment
- (July 2024) Cornwall Borough Council approves PRL and Rexmont Road subdivision plans
- (June 2026) Cornwall Borough considers combining citizens’ and lakefront amendments
- (July 2026) Cornwall planning recommends Boyd Street warehouse approval
Residents voice opposition
Residents overflowed the room, and the over four-hour meeting was dominated by public comments against the warehouse plan.
“To approve this this evening would be a slap in the face,” said resident Greg Olsen, which was met with a round of applause from the audience. He also stated how he felt this was a “dangerous proposal” and urged council to “do the right thing” in voting no.
Resident Carolyn Olsen expressed concern for the safety of her children and the other children who walk across Boyd Street to get to the school bus stop.
“Expecting to be walking on Boyd Street with the thoughts of 86 trips of tractor trailers coming off of 322 to go down to Miners Village is horrific,” said Olsen.
Resident Mike Wells, who moved to Cornwall with his wife just two weeks ago, said that if they would have known about the potential for development before purchasing their home, they would have not done it.
“We left an area that was beautiful and became overdeveloped, that the roads were so busy I didn’t want to be home,” said Wells. “We came here because of the beauty of the area and if I’d of known this, if we would have not been so far into the process of purchasing the house I would have not followed through I can guarantee that.”
Resident Jane Clark read a lengthy statement she had prepared in concern to soil testing done on the sites for proposed development by Cornwall Properties. Clark has filed a complaint with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection about this matter.
Borough Manager Cody Rhoads read eight public comments that had been submitted via email, which all urged council to vote no on the warehouse plan. Council directed Rhoads to include these comments in the meeting minutes.
Council also heard that there were 164 signatures in a change.org petition requesting that the plan be denied, approved with certain conditions, or granted another extension.
Professional recommendations
With a July 14 deadline for the borough to act, council needed to approve or reject the plan Monday. If council did not act on the plan, solicitor Josele Cleary said, it would be approved by default.
Cleary described the Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code, which governs borough and township land use powers, as “a very landowner-oriented statute,” noting that if a use is allowed in a zoning district, a municipality is required to allow it if it meets ordinance requirements. She added that if council rejected the plan and the developer appealed, the courts would make decisions based on information available now, and would not consider new studies or discoveries.
Both Cleary and alternate borough engineer Josh Weaber recommended approval of the warehouse plan. During the planning commission meeting July 6, Weaber was asked whether he felt there were grounds for the borough to reject the plan, and Weaber responded, “My honest opinion is no.”
Though multiple council members asked Cornwall Properties for a time extension, Byler declined. He said he continues to want to develop a lake resort community at the site, and is willing to negotiate for it with the borough, but said he has been waiting for action for several years. Cornwall Properties representative Mike Swank, when asked for an extension, asked what specific requirements the plan did not meet.
With preliminary approval granted Monday, Cornwall Properties will begin work on a final version of the plan. This involves state approvals like an National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit.
The preliminary approval locks in the plan (unless the developer rescinds it) and the use with the borough, but the developer will still need to come before council before a final plan is approved. Cornwall Properties representative Mike Swank said last week that the developer could, at earliest, break ground on the project in September or November of this year.
Conflict of interest allegations
Mixed in amongst public comments about the warehouse plan were comments concerning the transparency among the borough council and residents.
According to Karinch, Bowman sent an email listing his son’s employment by Steckbeck Engineering (SESI) as a potential conflict of interest. She asked him to resign from the planning commission, which he declined to do.
He read a statement listing every vote he took on Cornwall Properties matters in the last several years and said he was never the tie-breaker, concluding, “council did not need my vote, one single time, for anything.”
“I asked to be on planning and zoning because Mr. Fratini used to be on P&Z and council and he brought a wealth of knowledge to the following Monday night meetings because most council members do not attend planning and zoning meetings,” said Karinch. Conrad and Karinch sit on both council and P&Z.
Karinch also stated that he voluntarily submitted his situation to the Pennsylvania State Ethics Commission for review of potential conflict of interest, and will abstain from voting on matters that could have potential conflict of interest until he hears back from the commission. This includes the warehouse plan voted on Monday.
“Speaking of recusing, Julie, maybe you ought to recuse yourself since its your life mission to make Mr. Byler’s life miserable from here on out,” said Karinch.
Bowman asked Byler if he felt this way, after which he expressed his frustration stating that he felt solutions Bowman has attempted to present to him have been very “one-sided.”
Bowman also questioned the public perception of the connection of both the borough’s engineer Jeff Steckbeck and alternate engineer Josh Weaber (who handles SESI-connected plans) to SESI. Steckbeck was SESI’s founder, though he is now working as an independent contractor, and Weaber worked for SESI earlier in his career.
Cleary said that, according to state guidelines, these connections, as well as Karinch’s son’s employment by SESI, are likely not considered conflicts of interest.
Conrad said he felt potential and perceived conflicts of interest should be investigated, but vehemently opposed allegations members of council have or would take bribes, a claim he said is circulating on social media.

Resident and former council member Ron Ricard suggested that the borough create a resident committee to create an in-house conflict of interest policy to ensure perceived conflicts of interest are disclosed to the public, which Conrad said was a good idea. Harris asked Conrad to return next month with a more detailed recommendation.

In other business, the council:
- Approved to hire an independent engineering firm to study the possible construction of miners village bypass. Council will next review for engineering firms.
- Authorized spending up to $5,000 for a consultant for the regional firm commission to provide additional oversight and guidance.
- Authorized the hiring of a public works employee at a rate of $25/hour
- Authorized Dave Bradley as an additional check signed for the water and sewer accounts.
- Tabled action on numerous items initially slated for Monday’s meeting due to the length of discussion on the warehouse.
The Cornwall Borough Councils next meeting is scheduled for Monday, August 10 at 6:30 p.m. at 44 Rexmont Road, Lebanon, PA. Meetings are open to the public.
Questions about this story? Suggestions for a future LebTown article? Reach our newsroom using this contact form and we’ll do our best to get back to you.

Support Lebanon County journalism.
Cancel anytime.
Monthly Subscription
🌟 Annual Subscription
- Still no paywall!
- Fewer ads
- Exclusive events and emails
- All monthly benefits
- Most popular option
- Make a bigger impact
Already a member? Log in here to hide these messages
Free local news isn’t cheap. If you value the coverage LebTown provides, help us make it sustainable. You can unlock more reporting for the community by joining as a monthly or annual member, or supporting our work with a one-time contribution. Cancel anytime.

























